Saturday October 06, 2007 at 16:45
Subject: Linux Hardware: 3Ware 9650SX with Linux.
Keywords:
Hardware, Technical
Posted by: Sean Reifschneider
A client recently purchased a couple of new systems with PCI-E instead
of PCI-X (AKA 64-bit PCI, the old standard PCI but in a longer slot). The
3Ware PCI-E board is the new 9650SX. However, this board is only supported
by the drivers in the 2.6.19 and later kernels. Read on for more
information about using this board with Linux and especially Debian Etch.
This client is using Debian Etch, but the stock install disc for Etch,
as well as CentOS 5, uses 2.6.18 without a back-ported driver for this
board. 3Ware supplies an updated Etch CD, but this CD includes many
updated packages above what the stock Etch CD provides, and also uses an
apt.sources file which references Debian release "lenny". In other words,
using the 3Ware supplied CD will not result in the same installed
bits as a stock Etch CD, particularly if you answer "yes" to the "use
network installation source" installer question.
Saying "no" will cause it to install just from the CD, but there are
many updated packages on the CD. So installing from the CD and then
changing the source from "lenny" to "etch" and doing an upgrade is a better
option, but still not exactly what you would get from a stock Etch install
disc.
We looked briefly at building a custom install disc, but after a
couple of hours with many failed attempts, we decided to abandon this
route. Instead we added another hard drive to the system's on-board
controller and did:
(Post Reply)
-
Install to the hard drive on the supported controller.
Upgrade to the backports 2.6.22 kernel.
Reboot into the 2.6.22 kernel.
Copy the disc we installed on into the array.
Make the array bootable.
Remove the drive from the supported controller and reboot on the
array.
(Post Reply)
| Comment |
Nat Makarevitch Subject: Performances? |
Are you happy with the performances on random I/O? Writes? iowaits?
I had a 9550 and was very unhappy (140 random IOPS on a 6-drives RAID5!), just traded it for a 9650 which is now under test (see http://www.makarevitch.org/rant/3ware/ )
| Comment |
Author:
Sean Reifschneider Subject: Seems fine. |
It seems fine. It's not great, but I wouldn't call it particularly slow either. Though I haven't really measured it, I just use it. I do know that in the "safe" mode it is very slow. I set it for "balanced" and it seems fine with a BBU. I would agree that it's not up to the performance of the marketing claims 3ware makes, but it's a rock solid product under Linux and that's worth some performance to me.
Sean